| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Michael McCandless | Mar 17, 2008 2:06 pm | |
| eks dev | Mar 17, 2008 2:37 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 18, 2008 6:26 pm | |
| eks dev | Mar 19, 2008 3:45 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 19, 2008 4:01 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 19, 2008 5:52 am | |
| eks dev | Mar 19, 2008 6:31 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 19, 2008 6:48 am | |
| eks dev | Mar 19, 2008 7:58 am | |
| Doug Cutting | Mar 19, 2008 10:02 am | |
| robert engels | Mar 19, 2008 10:18 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 19, 2008 10:42 am | |
| Doug Cutting | Mar 19, 2008 11:01 am | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 19, 2008 11:15 am | |
| robert engels | Mar 19, 2008 11:17 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 19, 2008 12:49 pm | |
| eks dev | Mar 19, 2008 3:06 pm | |
| robert engels | Mar 19, 2008 3:39 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 19, 2008 5:57 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 21, 2008 3:45 am | |
| eks dev | Mar 23, 2008 2:28 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 24, 2008 2:14 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Mar 24, 2008 2:19 pm | |
| Doug Cutting | Mar 24, 2008 2:31 pm | |
| robert engels | Mar 24, 2008 3:43 pm | |
| Steven A Rowe | Mar 24, 2008 3:49 pm | |
| Doug Cutting | Mar 24, 2008 4:20 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 24, 2008 5:14 pm | |
| robert engels | Mar 24, 2008 9:46 pm | |
| Doug Cutting | Mar 25, 2008 7:29 am | |
| robert engels | Mar 25, 2008 9:25 am |
| Subject: | Fieldable, AbstractField, Field | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Michael McCandless (luc...@mikemccandless.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 17, 2008 2:06:55 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.java-dev | |
Hi,
I'm working on LUCENE-1219, which I think is a good improvement to the Field API for creating stored binary fields based on parts of a shared byte[].
I'm not really happy with the current patch because our hands are tied by the fact that we have Fieldable as an interface. I'd really like to move that to a base class, but...
Really, I think we could go just back to a single Field class instead of the three classes Fieldable, AbstractField and Field. If we had this then LUCENE-1219 would be easier to cleanly implement.
Here're some details:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219? page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578199#action_12578199
Is there some reason not to do this?
Mike





