126 messages in org.apache.lucene.generalRe: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr developm...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 8, 2010 6:11 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 6:18 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 6:21 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 8, 2010 6:23 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 6:31 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 6:38 pm | |
| Michael Busch | Mar 8, 2010 6:48 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 6:50 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 8, 2010 6:51 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 6:55 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 6:58 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 7:02 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 7:15 pm | |
| patrick o'leary | Mar 8, 2010 7:15 pm | |
| Ian Holsman | Mar 8, 2010 7:18 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 7:28 pm | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 8, 2010 8:24 pm | |
| Michael Busch | Mar 8, 2010 9:14 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 9:26 pm | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 8, 2010 9:33 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 9:37 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 9:40 pm | |
| Mark Miller | Mar 8, 2010 9:52 pm | |
| Dennis Kubes | Mar 8, 2010 10:09 pm | |
| Ted Dunning | Mar 8, 2010 10:46 pm | |
| Ted Dunning | Mar 8, 2010 10:51 pm | |
| Shalin Shekhar Mangar | Mar 8, 2010 11:12 pm | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 9, 2010 1:37 am | |
| Ian Holsman | Mar 9, 2010 2:01 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Mar 9, 2010 2:02 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Mar 9, 2010 2:09 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 9, 2010 2:40 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Mar 9, 2010 3:09 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 9, 2010 3:26 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 9, 2010 4:21 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Mar 9, 2010 4:57 am | |
| Michael McCandless | Mar 9, 2010 5:20 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 9, 2010 5:49 am | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 9, 2010 6:32 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 9, 2010 6:35 am | |
| Dennis Kubes | Mar 9, 2010 6:45 am | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 9, 2010 6:47 am | |
| Dennis Kubes | Mar 9, 2010 6:53 am | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 9, 2010 6:57 am | |
| Robert Muir | Mar 9, 2010 6:59 am | |
| Dennis Kubes | Mar 9, 2010 6:59 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Mar 9, 2010 7:03 am | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 9, 2010 7:13 am | |
| Robert Muir | Mar 9, 2010 7:34 am | |
| Mattmann, Chris A (388J) | Mar 9, 2010 7:41 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 9, 2010 7:44 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Mar 9, 2010 7:45 am | |
| 74 later messages | ||
| Subject: | Re: [VOTE] merge lucene/solr development (take 3) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mark Miller (mark...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 8, 2010 6:18:28 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.general | |
+1
This tally is not official, but here is my count of how people voted on this merge. A couple people that voted +1 on the first vote did not take the time to vote again. I've counted them as +1 as I assume they did not change their mind. Take that for what you will. This is not an official tally of the vote. If you think your counted wrong, fell free to correct me. In my mind, its hard to believe that all of these people on the front lines of Lucene/Solr development don't know what they are doing in regards to the project.
Bill Au : +1 Doug Cutting Otis Gospodnetić : +1 Erik Hatcher Chris Hostetter : -1 Grant Ingersoll : +1 Mike Klaas Shalin Shekhar Mangar : +1 Ryan McKinley : +1 Mark Miller : +1 Noble Paul : +1 Yonik Seeley : +1 Koji Sekiguchi : +1 Michael Busch : +1 Doron Cohen Mike McCandless : +1 Bernhard Messer Robert Muir : +1 Uwe Schindler : +1 Wolfgang Hoschek Patrick O'Leary Andi Vajda : +1 Karl Wettin Simon Willnauer : +1
On 03/08/2010 09:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Apoligies in advance for calling yet another vote, but I just wanted to make sure this was official. Mike's second VOTE thread could probably technically stand on it's own (since it included PMC votes), but given that I said in my previous VOTE thread that I was just polling Lucene/Solr committers and would call a second PMC vote, that may have acted to suppress PMC votes on Mike's thread also.
Please vote for the proposal quoted below to merge lucene/solr development. Here's my +1
-Yonik
Mike's call for a VOTE (amongst lucene/solr committers +11 to -1): http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/a400ffe62ae21aca/vote_merge_the_development_of_solr_lucene_take_2#22d7cd086d9c5cf0
Subject: Merge the development of Solr/Lucene (take 2) A new vote, that slightly changes proposal from last vote (adding only that Lucene can cut a release even if Solr doesn't):
* Merging the dev lists into a single list.
* Merging committers.
* When any change is committed (to a module that "belongs to" Solr or to Lucene), all tests must pass.
* Release details will be decided by dev community, but, Lucene may release without Solr.
* Modulariize the sources: pull things out of Lucene's core (break out query parser, move all core queries& analyzers under their contrib counterparts), pull things out of Solr's core (analyzers, queries).
These things would not change:
* Besides modularizing (above), the source code would remain factored into separate dirs/modules the way it is now.
* Issue tracking remains separate (SOLR-XXX and LUCENE-XXX issues).
* User's lists remain separate.
* Web sites remain separate.
* Release artifacts/jars remain separate.
-- - Mark